Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Reduced dominance is predicted for U.S.

Really? You must be kidding me.

Really?

Who could possibly have seen this coming?

An intelligence forecast being prepared for the next president on future global risks envisions a steady decline in U.S. dominance in the coming decades, as the world is reshaped by globalization, battered by climate change, and destabilized by regional upheavals over shortages of food, water and energy.

On the bright side, I have to say I'm glad we have somebody in our government somewhere who is assessing our near-term challenges in a clear-eyed way, reasonably free from the Mickey-Mouse fantasies of American exceptionalism, American inerrancy, and American hegemony which have become the rhetorical obligation of every politician in the nation - though of course wielded with especial gusto and proto-fascistic furor by our Republican friends.

(By the way, did you see those guys chanting USA! USA! USA! at their convention the other week? Downright frightening.)

--Or, now that I think of it, maybe that isn't on the bright side at all. That is, to think I now so implicitly expect our leaders to live in a fantasyland wherein America is always and in everything #1 - or I at least expect them to have to pretend whenever they open their mouths in public that they live in such a fantasyland - that I can be impressed to learn somebody among our 1.8 million nonpostal federal employees is noddingly acquainted with reality? Yich.

That, indeed, is a lot of how we came to be so screwed in the first place.



P.S. Kevin Phillips explains some of the problem quite well.

P.P.S. And so does David Letterman.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Thursday, September 4, 2008

post-convention

I was going to break radio silence tonight (my last post was mid-August) with a short reflection on the candidate acceptance speeches we've seen in the last week. I was out of town for most of the Democratic convention (but bless the good ol' boys at Burning Man Information Radio, who saw fit to broadcast Obama's speech last Thursday live). So I wanted to focus on McCain's and Palin's* speeches of these two evenings past.

For instance: I was going to say Palin's* speech last night was very effective. Barren, strikingly, of policy ideas, but effective. You hardly noticed she had nothing substantive to say - she spoke engagingly and gave Obama a number of gleefully meanspirited wallops. Wahoo! And as of this morning, all that stuff about her trying to fire the cop who'd divorced her sister, her support of Alaskan pork-barrel federal cash infusions and of disgraced Senator Ted Stevens' lobbying firm, her Alaskan separatism (???) - as well as the more tabloid stuff about her daughter's statutorily-raped-and-proud-of-it pregnancy: these things, post-speech, seem largely off the table. Until or unless, that is, the National Enquirer produces solid proof of Palin's* extra-marital affair with her husband's business partner. Or maybe until this report comes out.

I'd also meant to talk about McCain's speech tonight. An intriguing speech: intriguingly-enough filled with self-contradiction and logical loop-de-whorls to have come from a wayward Lewis Carroll book. He spends a third of his 49 minutes talking about the godawful mess this country is in - another third of it talking about how the fix for that mess is the precise boilerplate Republican philosophy and policies that led us there - then divides his remaining third into listing the countries he'd like to start new wars with (Iran, Russia), telling us how he hates war, and reiterating for us the little-known fact that he was at one time a POW himself. Then we get a weird closer about how we should fight for America by being active in our communities - weird coming the day after "community organizing" was repeatedly trashed for the sole reason that it was an early-career entry on Obama's resume.

But thank goodness I don't feel the need anymore to go on and on about that junk. Because these things now seem more important to me:

  • McCain's speech appears to have been received pretty poorly.
  • McCain's due a bounce from his convention, but Obama's national lead is currently measured at 5-points plus on average, and I believe he'll retain a statistically significant edge going into next week. More importantly, when you look at the state-by-state map, the distribution of these votes is critcially leaning in Barack's favor (260 electoral votes banked vs. McCain's 179 - with 99 more electoral votes in a very close toss-up - on a threshold of 270 needed to win).
  • And, last but far from least, this makes me happy.
Now, there's perhaps plenty of room for change in the polling figures... but increasingly less-plenty. We have 60 days till the election, and at least in the past few voting cycles there's been very little change in the numbers after post-convention bounces settle in. Presidential debates notwithstanding.

There's no doubt this election is going to be close, at least in terms of the national popular vote. Much closer than it has any right to be, of course, given how the Republicans have governed. Still, I remain tentatively optimistic... but it's going to be very interesting to watch the next batch of polls roll in after this weekend.


*Did she have to besmirch the name of a Python? For Christ's sake.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Shock doctrine

Naomi Klein is goddamned brilliant.

In case you didn't know.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Yes.

This guy couldn't be more right.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

"9-11 was an inside job" was an inside job

My rant:



Jeez, I've labored over the output quality of this thing and am still having (sound) glitches. I'll try getting up a version soon with cleaner audio.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008